A UX PROPOSAL FOR PREVIU HEALTH

Staywiththem

Designing how Previu feels for the people inside it.

Every result
belongs to a person
The Tribe Team · October 2026

A notebefore you read

Here’s a strange finding that shaped this proposal. In 2016, researchers at UCL found that people were more stressed by a 50% chance of a mild electric shock than by knowing it would definitely come. Uncertainty hurt more than the pain itself.

That is Previu’s real competitor. Not another app, but the gaps: the wait for a physician, the silence after a test, a status with no reason.

Your team has thought the system through carefully. Physicians approve every follow-up. Silence escalates. That is rare, and it is the right foundation.

What isn’t designed yet is how all of it feels to a son reading his mother’s report at night, a navigator with a full queue, and a physician with ten minutes between clinics. This proposal is about that layer.

It is also about pace. We would rather build Previu in phases, with your team, than design everything at once and hope it lands. Part 07 explains why.

You plan to use AI, and you should. But every result belongs to a person, and that person needs to feel someone is with them.

Words by
Nithin Prakash Motupalli

The Tribe Team

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
A NOTE BEFORE YOU READ00 — 2

We read your brief, your journeysand your references.Here’s what we found, andhow we’d act on it.

What we found

  1. Status isn’t meaning. Every status needs its reason, in plain words, for this person.
  2. The customer is several people. The patient, the family member holding the phone, and whoever pays.
  3. Prevention starts before the test. People need a reason to test that fits their life.
  4. The navigator is the product. Care and cost must never arrive together.
  5. Waiting is where trust breaks. Give every wait a map: what’s happening, who has it, and when they’ll hear.

What we propose, in phases

Late Oct – early Nov · Align. Research, one shared model of the system, personas and the state system.

November · The front door. Logo, website live, onboarding begins with your navigators.

December · Apps open. Patient app and navigator dashboard for a first group, with a physician link.

Jan – Mar 2027 · Deepen. The full journey, family flows, the complete doctor portal and testing rounds.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
IN SHORT00 — 3

What’sinside

Use the arrow keys, swipe, or the buttons below to move through the proposal. Press C to open the contents at any time.

A note before you readp. 2In shortp. 301Our understandingp. 502The gapp. 1503The customerp. 2304The navigatorp. 3105The physicianp. 4006Moments that matterp. 4507How we would build itp. 51QYour questionsp. 67Stay humanp. 75
UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
CONTENTS00 — 4
01
Our
under-
standing
UX PROPOSAL ’26
00 — 5
01——07

Previu exists sonobody is leftalone in the system

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 01 — OUR UNDERSTANDING00 — 6

Health is continuous.Healthcare isn’t.

Your homepage tells the story behind Previu: eight family members lost to cancer, each found late. Not because care didn’t exist, but because nobody stayed with them through the system.

Hospitals own an episode, labs own a report, insurers own a claim. The patient is left to connect them.

So the promise in your brief is simple: one connected record, one human guide, and you never have to work out what to do next.

Everything in this proposal is measured against that promise. Wherever a screen, a message or a wait breaks it, we say so.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 01 — OUR UNDERSTANDING00 — 7
From your brief

Where Previu stands,
as of 21 October 2026—

Navigation serviceRunningHuman navigators guide patients today, mainly in cancer care.
Patient app, navigator and doctor portalsBuilt, in testThe patient app is moving from a dark to a light theme.
WebsiteLiveTo be redesigned.
Home blood drawIn progressThyrocare through BookMyTest. Blood only; no measurements at home.
Imaging partnersAbout 20 NovDepends on confirmed partners, so it needs a clear fallback.
WearablesPlannedApple Watch, Whoop, Fitbit and Samsung, into the same record.
PaymentsAt launchCustomers pay at each stage, with the price shown first.
Platform go-liveNovemberThe target date, India first.
Worth noting

Your strongest asset

In short
The navigation service already runs. Real navigators, real families. That is what Previu launches on.
Snap this

The service exists.
The platform is in test.

What customers meet first in November is the website, onboarding and their navigator. That is where the first phase of design should go.

The Tribe Team ’26

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 01 — OUR UNDERSTANDING00 — 8

Three people,one record,six stages

One shared
record

Customer

Sees a path: where am I, what happens next, and who do I ask?

Navigator

Sees the work: one open item per customer, with an owner, a deadline and a channel.

Physician

Approves every follow-up, clears red results, reviews every cancer signal.

Join

Baseline

Clarify

Imaging

Pathways

Staying with you

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 01 — OUR UNDERSTANDING00 — 9

Nine states,set by rules,not by people

Your clinical rules give every result one state. Each state has wording for the customer and a view for the navigator.

Green

“No action needed.”

Queue: nothing

Watchful

“Recheck planned.”

Queue: nothing

Amber

“Something to work on.”

Queue: only on a repeat, a worsening trend or a request

Red

“Your physician is reviewing your results.”

Queue: locked until the physician clears it

Critical

“We need to speak to you today.”

Queue: at once, acknowledged within 2 hours

Emergency

“Get medical help now.”

Queue: at once; the navigator stays on the case

Cancer signal

“Your results are with your physician.”

Queue: locked and redacted

Recovery

“Good progress.”

Queue: ready, so it can be celebrated together

Data hold

“We need one more thing.”

Queue: an operations item to fix

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 01 — OUR UNDERSTANDING00 — 10

How the workmoves, and whomay do what

The navigator works from one open item per customer per episode. Its urgency can only go up, and it closes only when the step has actually happened.

An item’s life

Created

Physician check

Ready

Acknowledged

Step done

Closed

When nobody responds

½ window
A reminder to the navigator
1 window
The navigator lead is alerted
1½ windows
The Medical Director is alerted

Who may do what

System. Sets the state, drafts the wording, sends reminders. Never diagnoses.

Navigator. Talks, arranges, follows through. Can reword, retime, escalate. Cannot add a test, change a state, reinterpret a result or disclose a cancer signal.

Physician. Approves every follow-up, clears red cases, reviews every cancer signal.

Medical Director. Decides critical cases and takes escalations from navigators.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 01 — OUR UNDERSTANDING00 — 11

What your documentsalready get right

Physicians approve every step

Nothing is arranged until a doctor has agreed it.

Done means it happened

A step closes when the test is taken, not when a call is made.

Silence escalates

To the navigator lead at the window, the Medical Director at one and a half.

Held results stay held

No values or marker names until a physician has cleared them.

Nothing invented to fill a screen

No manufactured scores, warnings or tasks.

Price before commitment

The customer sees the cost before confirming any step.

These are the foundations of a service people can trust. Everything that follows builds on them.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 01 — OUR UNDERSTANDING00 — 12

Others explain results.Previu stays until thenext step has happened

Function HealthNostaviaPreviu
After a resultClinician notes and a protocol. Its terms say it does not recommend or refer.AI explanation and protocols.A physician-approved next step, arranged and followed until it has happened.
The humanBehind the product.AI first; human support depends on the partner.A named navigator, one tap away.
ToneAspirational, with celebrity endorsements.Scores, biological age, gamified.Calm and honest.
ModelConsumer membership, $365 a year.An AI layer sold to labs and clinics, under their brand.The customer pays per stage, price shown first.

Sometimes the strongest position is the opposite of a competitor’s. Function sells the fear of what might be hidden. Previu can sell the relief of never facing it alone.

Function figures from functionhealth.com, October 2026. Nostavia from its website, app store listings and public profiles.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 01 — OUR UNDERSTANDING00 — 13
Supporting data

Function Health, the reference
in your brief, as of October 2026—

$365

a year, framed as $1 a day

160+

lab tests, tested twice a year; MRI and CT as add‑ons

Worth noting

Where Function stops

The gap
Function’s own terms say it does not recommend or refer. A recurring theme in its reviews is the lack of human follow-up. That gap is Previu’s opportunity.
Snap this

Worth taking

  • Plain-language explanations for every result
  • Test lists labelled included, twice a year, or add-on
  • One headline price, and what it includes
  • Named clinicians, up front

Worth leaving

  • “Thousands of diseases” fear marketing
  • Celebrity endorsements
  • Dramatic detection stories
  • Results with no person to talk to
UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 01 — OUR UNDERSTANDING00 — 14
02
The
gap
UX PROPOSAL ’26
00 — 15
02——07

You’ve designedhow Previu decides.Next, designhow it feels.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 02 — THE GAP00 — 16

Your system runs on logic.People run on feelings.

Feelings are the reasons people act on, and a spreadsheet rarely predicts them.

What the system knows

What the person feels

A physician has cleared the result, so the status is green.

“Six numbers are flagged and nobody says why. It feels like I’m being fobbed off.”

The physician review is inside its agreed window.

“Nobody has told me when. It feels like bad news is coming.”

The follow-up has a fair price, shown before anyone confirms.

“They told me something is wrong, then asked for money. It feels like a sales pitch.”

Most customers never message their navigator, so the option looks unused.

“Knowing I could message someone is why I felt safe.”

Both columns are true. Only the second decides whether people trust Previu, come back, and tell their family.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 02 — THE GAP00 — 17
An illustrative case

A mother’s results,
and her son reading them—

82

years old, three years of steady results, expected for her age, cleared by a physician. The system says green.

6

values printed outside the report’s normal range. That is what her son sees.

The moment

Right status,
wrong experience

Worth noting
The screen says “No action needed”. It gives no reason. Her son goes looking for someone else to ask.
Snap this

Status is a product decision.
Meaning is personal.

Every status needs its reason, in plain words, for this person: what was checked, what’s outside the usual range, and why that is or isn’t expected.

The Tribe Team ’26

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 02 — THE GAP00 — 18
In their words · illustrative

“If six numbers are off,why does it sayshe’s fine?I need to talkto someone.”

Words byA son, reading his mother’s report
An illustrative voice,
drawn from the case above
UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 02 — THE GAP00 — 19

“Normal”depends onthe person

The printed range on a report is written for an average adult. A Previu status is written for this person. The screen has to explain the difference.

Later in life

At 82, several values can sit outside the printed range and still be expected for her age and history. The system says green; her son sees flags.

Before, during and after pregnancy

Pregnancy changes what normal looks like. Thyroid results, for example, are read against pregnancy-specific ranges, so a value inside the printed range may not be right for her, and the reverse.

Living with a long-term condition

Someone managing a condition has their own usual numbers. What matters is the change since their last result, not the distance from the printed range.

In one Australian study, applying general thyroid ranges to women in early pregnancy misclassified about one in five of them (Medical Journal of Australia). The clinical rules for each case are set by your physicians; the design makes them visible.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 02 — THE GAP00 — 20

Every statusneeds its why

As planned

✓
Your latest results have been reviewed
No action needed. Reviewed by Dr Menon, 12 Sep.

A verdict without a reason. If the family can see flagged numbers in the report, it reads as a contradiction.

Why it works

When a service shows the work it has done, people value the result more, even when the result is identical. Harvard’s Ryan Buell and Michael Norton call this the labour illusion. “What we checked” is the work, made visible.

Illustrative

No action needed

What we checked

Your blood test from 12 Sep, alongside two years of earlier results.

Outside the usual range

3 results · See which

Why that’s expected for you

For your age and history, Dr Menon considers these normal for you. We’ll check again in March.

Reviewed by

Dr Menon, 14 Sep

Message AswathyWant to talk it through?
Usually replies within 2 hours.

Green, Amber and Red stay out of the customer’s view. Age-, pregnancy- and history-aware readings come from your clinical team; design makes them visible.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 02 — THE GAP00 — 21

Say enough,not everything

How much information is too much? Enough to understand, never enough to overwhelm, and a named person and a time in every message that asks someone to wait.

What a red badge says on its own

Red

Physician review required

Before a word is read, the colour has already told the family something is wrong. Often a review is simply the next routine step.

Calmer, and still honest

Your physician is taking a closer look at two results

This is a standard step before any follow-up. You don’t need to do anything yet.

Aswathy will update you by Thursday, 6pm.

See which results, and why

Colour never speaks alone

A label and an icon, every time.

Meaning first, detail one tap away

For those who want it, never forced on those who don’t.

A time and a name

In every message that asks someone to wait.

Illustrative wording. Final copy needs sign-off from your physicians.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 02 — THE GAP00 — 22
03
The
customer
UX PROPOSAL ’26
00 — 23
03——07

The customeris never justone person

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 03 — THE CUSTOMER00 — 24

Four peoplehide inone word

Two questions separate people more than age or income: are they looking after themselves or someone else, and do they want to know?

Looking after myself

Looking after someone else

Wants to know ↑

Would rather not ↓

The planner

Reads everything and asks questions. Needs depth when they want it, and a reason to keep testing.

The worried child

Manages a parent’s health, often from another city. Needs access, updates, and to be reachable when it matters.

The avoider

Tests only when pushed. Needs one clear message and a person they trust, not a dashboard.

The reluctant parent

Being looked after, sometimes unwillingly. Needs dignity, plain words and a phone call rather than an app.

Also in the picture: spouses, caretakers and whoever pays. The patient, the person holding the phone and the payer are often three different people.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 03 — THE CUSTOMER00 — 25

Nobody testswithout a reason

A reason to test

Join

Baseline

Clarify

Imaging

Pathways

Staying with you

New

There is nothing preventive in the journey yet: it begins at the blood draw. Prevention has to begin earlier, with the reason someone decides to test.

This new first stage helps each person see why testing now makes sense for them, from their age, their history and their family, without using fear.

Cancel the Cancer’s screening camps are a natural doorway into it.

What actually brings people in

A relative’s diagnosisA symptom or a worryA milestone birthdayA report already in handAn employer or community campA gift from a son or daughter
UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 03 — THE CUSTOMER00 — 26

Cancer is whyPreviu exists,not a reason to fear it

Cancer can touch anyone, so the person to design for is not “a cancer patient”. It is anyone with a reason to look.

As the reason

Prevention and screening: family history, age, a worry. Spoken about honestly and calmly, never with fear.

As a signal

Handled only by physicians. Never shown raw, and never reaching a family before the patient has been told personally.

As a journey

Treatment support, where your navigators already work today. The deepest proof of what “we stay with you” means.

A question to settle

Does cancer lead the story, or sit behind “every critical illness”? Our suggestion: lead with continuity, and let cancer be the proof, through the founder’s story and the families your navigators already support.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 03 — THE CUSTOMER00 — 27

Family isone flow,not a profile switcher

How children look after their parents, and how parents look at their own results, should be designed as one flow, from both directions.

A son or daughter caring for a parent

  • Books tests on a parent’s behalf
  • Sees only what they’ve been allowed to see
  • Is reachable when news is urgent

A parent looking at their own results

  • Large type and plain words
  • A phone call, not only an app
  • Decides what their children can see

Rules the whole family can trust

  • Each adult gives their own consent, as the DPDP Act requires
  • Access is withdrawn as easily as it was given
  • Every view of a record is logged
To decide first

When a result is serious, who hears first: the patient, or the person holding the phone?

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 03 — THE CUSTOMER00 — 28

Customers havework to do too

The navigator’s tasks are designed in detail. The customer’s own tasks, where most drop-off happens, aren’t yet. The highlighted ones are where we expect people to slip.

1

Give consent

2

Prepare for the draw

3

Be home for the technician

4

Enter BP, weight and waist

5

Read the report

6

Decide on next steps

7

Attend the scan or visit

8

Come back for the recheck

The right reminder, at the right time

On WhatsApp, the night before the draw and the morning of it.

Check unusual entries

A reading that looks wrong is confirmed before it counts, so a typo never triggers an alarm.

Show what’s done and what’s next

Progress the customer can see, so the next task is never a surprise.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 03 — THE CUSTOMER00 — 29

The choice always stays with the person

Anyone can ask for a person,at any status.We inform.We never push.

Green means nothing is urgent. It doesn’t mean “you don’t need to talk”. If someone wants to speak to a navigator or a doctor, that is their choice. Offer it, with an honest reply time.

Even at red, say clearly how urgent it is and what the next step is. The decision is theirs, and saying no never ends the relationship. That is exactly the person who needs us to stay.

Worth knowing

In a field experiment by Michelle Kinch and Harvard’s Ryan Buell, simply inviting anxious loan applicants to reach a person raised uptake by 24%, even though very few took up the offer. Management Science.

A test for every screen: is this honest, and is it in this person’s interest?

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 03 — THE CUSTOMER00 — 30
04
The
navigator
UX PROPOSAL ’26
00 — 31
04——07

However the navigatormakes someone feelis how they’ll feelabout Previu

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 04 — THE NAVIGATOR00 — 32

Your navigatoris the hero

The system can find the pattern. Only the navigator can make it human. They are the reason someone trusts a result, books the follow-up, and comes back next time.

The same person, every time

Continuity is the promise. A handover is the exception, and it is always explained.

Translates, never sells

Explains, arranges and stays. Prices come from the app, never from the navigator.

Knows when to bring in a doctor

Clinical questions go to physicians quickly, and the customer knows who is looking.

Why a call beats a notification. People judge how much a message means by how much it cost to send. A navigator’s call is a costly signal of care; a push notification is not.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 04 — THE NAVIGATOR00 — 33

From what the system findsto what a person hears

The system can cross-reference every result. A person has to make it land well. An illustrative example.

1 · The system notices

Fasting glucose

Apr

Aug

Oct

Third rise in a row

2 · The system drafts

System draft

Your fasting glucose has risen across your last three tests. A follow-up is recommended.

Correct, but it reads like a lab, not like someone who knows you.

3 · The navigator makes it human

Aswathy · WhatsApp

Hi Meena, it’s Aswathy. I went through your results with Dr Menon. One number has been creeping up since April. It isn’t urgent, but it’s worth acting on now, while it’s easy. Could I call you this evening to talk it through?

Navigators can reword, retime and choose the channel. They can’t change the clinical meaning. That line stays.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 04 — THE NAVIGATOR00 — 34

Keep careand cost apart

Behavioural economists call it the pain of paying: a price hurts most when it is tied to the moment of use (Prelec and Loewenstein, 1998). At Clarify, the price arrives at the most frightening moment of all.

As planned

A result needs a closer look
→
Next Step card: recommendation and price together
→
Navigator arranges and books

Asked for money while worried, people think: this is how they make money from me. The navigator starts to look like a salesperson.

As we would design it

1
Result explained, calmly
→
2
The physician’s recommendation, and why
→
3
Time to ask questions
→
4
Cost shown by the app, on its own
→
5
Navigator helps book

Worth exploring: include the first follow-up in the Baseline price, so the most anxious moment never brings a new payment.

An “I need time to think about the cost” option, so the navigator knows it’s a cost question, not a refusal.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 04 — THE NAVIGATOR00 — 35

“We stay with you”has to be full-time

Full-time doesn’t mean a navigator online around the clock. It means nobody is ever alone with a result, even at 2am.

A rhythm for everyone

Today, Green and Watchful results never reach a navigator, so most customers meet theirs once and then hear nothing. A light rhythm changes that: a welcome, a walkthrough if wanted, a check-in before the next review, and a moment to celebrate improvement.

An honest answer to “when?”

Every message is acknowledged with a time. When a navigator is offline, the app says so, with their hours, the expected reply time, and what to do if it’s urgent.

Round-the-clock where it matters

Your own proposal: set hours for chat, with 24-hour cover for critical and emergency cases. The 2-hour promise holds only if overnight cover is staffed, with a backup.

Most of the rhythm can be drafted by the system and sent by the navigator, so it doesn’t depend on queue capacity.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 04 — THE NAVIGATOR00 — 36

Where the navigatormeets the customer

Every stage has a human moment. These are the ones we would design first, and the channel each belongs on. Clarify is the one that matters most.

Join

A welcome call. “I’m Aswathy, and I’ll be with you from here.”

Call

Baseline

A reminder the night before the draw, and a walkthrough of the report if wanted.

WhatsApp · App

Clarify

Explains the finding in plain words, and stays close while the physician reviews.

Call · WhatsApp

Imaging

Books the slot, confirms attendance, and explains the report once it’s in.

WhatsApp · App

Pathways

Coordinates each step, and keeps the family informed, with permission.

Call · WhatsApp

Staying with you

Check-ins, recheck reminders, and celebrating good progress.

WhatsApp · App

Family members join these moments only with the patient’s permission, and only at the moments the patient chooses.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 04 — THE NAVIGATOR00 — 37

Urgency is fixed.Priority is flexible.

Fixed: clinical urgency is set by your rules and physicians. It is never lowered by hand.

Flexible: how the day is planned belongs to the navigator, by patient or by task, by theme or by deadline. Sometimes being with a patient matters more than closing a task.

The system’s job: connect the dots, and say what matters today and why.

Illustrative

Today, for Aswathy

Three themes, in order, and why

1
3 families waiting on a physician review, one past its deadline
Why: families in review are the most anxious, and a promise is about to be missed.
2
2 people haven’t replied in 7 days
Why: silence after a result needs a check before it becomes drop-off.
3
4 home blood draws tomorrow
Why: preparation reminders today prevent missed draws tomorrow.

Navigators can reorder these. Clinical urgency can’t be lowered.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 04 — THE NAVIGATOR00 — 38

Heroes needsupport too

Who they are

People with basic healthcare knowledge, trained for difficult conversations. Customers should know what their navigator is: nurse, counsellor or coordinator.

A direct line to physicians

Their review queue, their availability, and a logged way to ask. Without it, all a navigator can say is “please wait”.

A workload you can plan

One number, 150 families, can’t plan a team. Preventive members and families in active care need separate numbers.

Looking after the navigator

Delivering hard news all day is heavy. Caseload limits, handover cover and regular debriefs keep people well, and kind.

Ask early

How are navigators measured? If any target is tied to sales, the trust model breaks.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 04 — THE NAVIGATOR00 — 39
05
The
physician
UX PROPOSAL ’26
00 — 40
05——07

When it’s red,people wanta doctor

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 05 — THE PHYSICIAN00 — 41

Three needs,one missing link

In a red moment people panic, and they don’t trust a coordinator to answer. If the navigator doesn’t know when the doctor will look, the experience breaks.

What the customer needs

  • To know when the physician will look, and when they’ll hear back
  • A way to reach a doctor when worried, not only a coordinator
  • A named physician they can see, which builds more trust than any endorsement

What the navigator needs

  • The physician’s review queue and availability
  • A direct, logged line to ask a question
  • A warning before a review misses its deadline

What the physician needs

  • Short, focused review sessions with safe defaults
  • Only the cases that need them, already summarised
  • Never being chased over WhatsApp
Good news

You’ve decided to design the doctor portal with the navigator dashboard. For the apps’ opening, the minimum is one shared view: who is reviewing what, and by when.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 05 — THE PHYSICIAN00 — 42

Everyone should knowwhat the others are doing

The customer sees

  • Who is handling it, by name
  • When they’ll hear, and from whom
  • Which physician reviewed their result

The navigator sees

  • The physician’s queue and availability
  • The customer’s last contact and consent
  • What the customer has been told

The physician sees

  • A short case summary
  • What the navigator has already done
  • What the customer has been told so far

One result, one shared timeline · illustrative

09:10

Result arrives

09:12

Physician check created

09:30

Customer told: “Dr Menon is reviewing; update by 6pm”

14:05

Physician clears; follow-up approved

14:20

Aswathy calls the customer

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 05 — THE PHYSICIAN00 — 43
In their words · illustrative

“If I can’t tell herwhen the doctor will look,all I can say is‘please wait’.That’s when families leave.”

Words byA navigator, on a red day
An illustrative voice,
drawn from your journeys
UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 05 — THE PHYSICIAN00 — 44
06
Moments
that
matter
UX PROPOSAL ’26
00 — 45
Supporting data

UCL, 2016: 45 people, a game of
hidden snakes and mild shocks—

50%

chance of a shock was the most stressful condition of all

100%

certain shocks were among the least stressful

Worth noting

The Uber map

Worth knowing
Uber’s map barely changes how long you wait for a car. It changes how the wait feels, because you can watch the car coming.
Snap this

Previu needs a map
for every wait.

More physicians won’t make a review feel shorter. Showing who has it, and when you’ll hear, will. Changes like this are small to build and huge in how they feel.

The Tribe Team ’26

Source: de Berker et al., Nature Communications, 2016 (University College London).

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 06 — MOMENTS THAT MATTER00 — 46

Waiting is wheretrust is lost

When someone is anxious and gets no answer, they leave and rely on someone else. Every party should be able to answer four questions at any moment. Together, they are the map.

01What is happening now?

02Who has it?

03When will I hear?

04What happens next?

Your results · the map

Received
09:10
With Dr Menon
now
Update by
6pm today
Saw your question. I’ll reply by 4pm today.

Aswathy · Usually replies within 2 hours

  • The time comes from real data, not a target
  • An acknowledgement counts as a response
  • When results are with a physician, show the physician’s time too
  • When someone is offline, say so, with hours and what to do if it’s urgent

The same idea Airbnb uses with hosts: an honest expected time lets people stop checking, and the reply often arrives sooner.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 06 — MOMENTS THAT MATTER00 — 47
Supporting data

A randomised trial in
colonoscopy patients—

682

patients. For half, the procedure ended more gently.

1.41×

the odds of coming back for a repeat colonoscopy, over about five years

Worth noting

The peak and the end

For Previu
Previu’s peak is the red moment. Its end is the message that closes an episode. Both decide whether people come back for the recheck.
Snap this

People remember the worst
moment and the last one.

Kahneman’s peak-end rule. So we fix the peak first, then give every episode a good ending: “Good progress”, a thank-you, the next date. The middle still counts; the evidence says so too.

The Tribe Team ’26

Sources: Redelmeier, Katz and Kahneman, Pain, 2003; Alaybek et al., meta-analysis, 2022.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 06 — MOMENTS THAT MATTER00 — 48

Nine moments that can break,and our answer to each

Your journeys document lists these breaking points. Here is how we would approach each.

The home draw doesn’t happen

Rebook in one tap, navigator alerted, and no blame in the wording.

A result is held for a physician

A calm, honest status with a time. No values, and no lab report reaching the customer first.

Red, and the customer is asking

An acknowledgement with the physician’s expected time, and a way for the navigator to escalate.

The customer declines a follow-up

Two clear paths, “I’ve decided” and “it’s the cost”. The issue stays open, and so does the door.

Lab data is unclear or incomplete

Data hold says what’s missing and why, with one action to fix it.

Someone can’t be reached in a critical case

A fallback agreed with your clinical team, including a family contact the patient has approved.

The navigator is away or leaves

Handover with full context, and the customer is told their new navigator’s name.

A step costs extra

The price is shown on its own, after the clinical conversation and before anything is confirmed.

Family access or consent changes

It takes effect at once, both sides are told, and it is logged.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 06 — MOMENTS THAT MATTER00 — 49

Six things to resolvebefore launch

Questions to confirm with your team, not conclusions. Each one changes what we design, and some could hurt a real person if missed.

To resolveWhy it mattersWho decides
1Lab reports reaching customers directlyMany booking channels send reports straight to the patient’s phone. If that happens, the physician hold no longer holds.Tech and lab partner
2Self-entered readings triggering EmergencyA typo in a blood pressure entry could tell someone to call 112.Clinical and design
3Red and cancer-signal wording differFamilies will learn to tell the two messages apart.Clinical and design
4Urgency can only go upPhysicians need a logged way to step an item down, or queues fill with past alarms.Clinical and product
5Family access and serious newsWho is contacted first: the patient, or the account holder?Clinical, legal, design
6Green customers and the navigatorA promise of companionship needs a rhythm, not silence.Product and operations

Also worth deciding early: who receives the daily digest, and on which channel; quiet hours for notifications; how WhatsApp conversations are stored in the record, with consent; and how a customer leaves, taking their record with them.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 06 — MOMENTS THAT MATTER00 — 50
07
How we
would
build it
UX PROPOSAL ’26
00 — 51
07——07

Doing everythingat once is howgood productsfall flat

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 07 — HOW WE WOULD BUILD IT00 — 52

Why we’d buildPreviu in phases

Decisions come before screens. Who pays first, how family access works, what a red result says: these are still open. Design every surface before they’re settled and you design it twice.

Phase 1 settles them once, together.

Your developers can only absorb so much at once. One huge handoff in the weeks before launch is how quality slips quietly, screen by screen.

Each phase hands over a finished, tested piece, so the build keeps pace with the design.

Nothing replaces real people using it. Every phase opens something to real customers and navigators, and what we learn shapes the next.

If one part slips, the rest still ships: the website can go live while the apps finish.

And the cheapest wins come first: a reason on every status, a time on every wait, a name on every message. Changes like these are small to build and large in how they feel.

From Nithin, The Tribe Team

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 07 — HOW WE WOULD BUILD IT00 — 53

All at once,or in phases

The same work, two ways of doing it. The difference shows up at launch, and in what families experience in their first month.

If we design everything at onceIf we build in phases
Open decisionsScreens get designed around guesses, then redesigned once the answers arrive.Phase 1 settles who pays, family rules and clinical wording before any screen depends on them.
Features that aren’t readyImaging, wearables and the full doctor portal appear before they exist, breaking your own rule: never imply a feature works if it doesn’t.Each surface shows only what is live, and grows as partners and features arrive.
Your team’s capacityOne big handoff lands on your developers just before launch.Smaller, tested handoffs your developers can build with confidence.
LearningThe first real feedback arrives after everything is built.Every opening is tested with real people, and the next phase uses what we learn.
Launch riskIf one piece slips, the launch slips.The website and onboarding go live in November while the apps are finished.
UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 07 — HOW WE WOULD BUILD IT00 — 54

Eight principleswe’d add to yours

Your brief’s nine principles stay as they are. These eight add the human side of the same system.

1Explain the why behind every status

Meaning before numbers, reasoning before verdicts.

2Keep care and cost apart

The clinical conversation first; the price later, from the app.

3Give every wait a map

What’s happening, who has it, when you’ll hear, what’s next.

4The person always chooses

Inform clearly, never push, never close the door.

5Prevention starts before the test

Give each person a reason to test that fits their life.

6Design the family, not the profile

Patients, the people helping them, and the people paying.

7Automate the door, keep the doorman

AI for the routine; people for reassurance.

8Empathy for all three

Customers’ fear, navigators’ workload and physicians’ time.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 07 — HOW WE WOULD BUILD IT00 — 55

How we work:four modes, in parallel

Your brief asks us to start now and validate as we go, building on the platform you already have. Every phase runs all four, in different measure.

Understand

Research with navigators, physicians and families. We learn the real work before redesigning it.

Align

One shared model of the system, agreed with your team. Decisions recorded; assumptions kept separate.

Design

Flows, screens and the words, built on your existing platform rather than starting again.

Validate

Testing with real people before each opening, including whether they understand their results.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 07 — HOW WE WOULD BUILD IT00 — 56

Research: who we’ll learnfrom, and what for

Light, fast and focused on the real work. Most of it happens in Phase 1; testing continues through every phase.

MethodWith whomWhat we learnWhen
Shadowing2–3 navigators, half a day eachThe real queue, real calls, real waitsPhase 1
Interviews1–2 reviewing physicians, and the Medical DirectorReview rhythm, sign-off needs, what slows them downPhase 1
Family conversations6–8 people across the four customer types, including adult children and elderly parentsWhy they test, what they fear, and the words they usePhase 1
Field visitOne Cancel the Cancer screening campThe community doorway into PreviuPhases 1–2
Product auditThe current app, portals and websiteWhat to keep, and what to fix firstPhase 1
Conversation reviewAnonymised WhatsApp threads and support logsThe real questions, and where people waitPhase 1
Usability rounds5–6 people per round, per surfaceEase of use, and whether results are understoodPhases 2–4

Every conversation with a patient or family is consented and anonymised, in line with the DPDP Act.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 07 — HOW WE WOULD BUILD IT00 — 57

The roadmapat a glance

The website opens in November, onboarding starts with your navigators, and the apps open about a month later. The work deepens from January.

Late Oct – early Nov
November
December
Jan – Mar 2027

Research and validation

Alignment and system model

Logo and brand

Website and onboarding

Patient app

Navigator dashboard and physician link

Full journey, family, doctor portal

Design system and handoff

Milestones

Website live

Your imaging partners, ~20 Nov

Apps open to a first group

Assumes we start in the last week of October 2026. Development runs on your side in parallel, from each handoff.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 07 — HOW WE WOULD BUILD IT00 — 58
1

Phase 1 · late October to early November, about two weeks

Align

One shared picture of the system, agreed before anything is redesigned.

What we do

  • Shadow navigators and sit with physicians
  • Talk with families across the four customer types
  • Audit the current app, portals and website
  • Two workshops with your team: one system, and states and words

What you get

  • A service blueprint of all three journeys, including the new first stage
  • Personas and the family model
  • The state system, version one: one component and draft wording for all nine states
  • Experience principles, a prioritised risk list, two or three logo directions

What we decide together

  • Who pays first, and who the website speaks to
  • Family permission rules for serious results
  • Whether the first follow-up sits inside Baseline
  • The logo direction, and how navigators are measured
Milestone

Ready to move on when your team has agreed the system model, the personas and version one of the state system, and a logo direction is chosen.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 07 — HOW WE WOULD BUILD IT00 — 59
2

Phase 2 · November

The front door

The logo is final, the website goes live and onboarding begins, with your navigators welcoming the first customers while the apps are finished.

Brand

  • Final mark, light and dark
  • App icon and favicon
  • Short usage rules, shown in use

Website

  • Homepage first, then how it works, what we test, navigators, pricing, families, privacy and FAQ
  • One primary action
  • The real product shown, with named clinicians
  • Tested with 5–6 people before it goes live

Early onboarding

  • Sign-up and layered consent on the website
  • A welcome from a named navigator, by phone and WhatsApp, as the service works today
  • Baseline booked with the navigator’s help where the integration isn’t ready

Foundations

  • Design tokens, type and colour
  • One severity scale for every surface
  • The first developer handoff
Milestone

The website is live and the first customers are onboarded by navigators. Ready to move on when sign-up and consent test well.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 07 — HOW WE WOULD BUILD IT00 — 60
3

Phase 3 · December

Apps open

The patient app and the navigator dashboard open to a first group, about a month after the website, with a physician link in place.

Patient app

  • Onboarding and consent
  • Today, with every status and its why
  • Journey, Care and Profile
  • Reaching your navigator, including when they’re offline

Navigator dashboard

  • Today’s themes, and why
  • Queue and escalations
  • Patient view, with the conversation beside the record
  • Handover when a navigator is away

Physician link

  • Who is reviewing what, and by when
  • Review times visible to navigators and customers
  • Sign-off for follow-ups

Before opening

  • Accessibility: contrast, text size, low digital literacy
  • A usability round with customers and navigators
  • Open to a first group: current navigation families and early sign-ups
Milestone

The apps open to a first group. Ready to move on when customers can name their next step and navigators can run their day from the dashboard.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 07 — HOW WE WOULD BUILD IT00 — 61
4

Phase 4 · January to March 2027

Deepen

The full journey, the family, the physician, and the evidence that it works.

The full journey

  • Clarify, Imaging and Pathways views
  • One living timeline, with wearable data once it arrives

Family

  • Children caring for parents
  • Parents viewing their own results
  • Permission and consent changes

Physicians

  • The complete doctor portal
  • Quiet, precise, and sign-off in minutes

Proof

  • Usability rounds two and three
  • Comprehension testing with your physicians
  • Design system complete, with final handoff
  • An AI assistant, if added, built to the rules in “Stay human”
Milestone

The full journey is live, with three rounds of testing behind it and a design system your developers can build on alone.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 07 — HOW WE WOULD BUILD IT00 — 62

Your deliverables, mapped to the plan

Groundwork: research, direction, decisions
Main work: designed, tested, handed over
Refine: improved from real use

Deliverable

Phase 1 · Align

Phase 2 · Front door

Phase 3 · Apps open

Phase 4 · Deepen

Website

Audience, single action, page map
Designed, tested, live
Refined from real use
Refined from real use

Patient app (mobile)

Flows and the state system
Sign-up and consent, shared with the website
Core screens, ready to open
Full journey and family

Navigator dashboard (desktop)

Shadowing: how navigators work
—
Themes, queue, patient view, handover
Refined from real use

Doctor portal

Interviews: the review rhythm
—
Minimum link: who reviews what, by when
The complete portal

Logo redesign

Two or three directions
Final mark and usage rules
—
—

Design system and severity scale

State system, version one
Foundations: tokens, type, colour
App and dashboard components
Complete, with final handoff

Structure and key flows

Service blueprint of all journeys
Website and sign-up
Apps and dashboard
Clarify, Imaging and Pathways

Wireframes, high fidelity, prototypes

—
Website and onboarding
Patient app and dashboard
Full journey and portal

Usability testing, and the fixes

—
Website and sign-up
Before the apps open
Rounds two and three

Developer handoff

—
First handoff
Apps and dashboard
Final handoff

Status and message wording (our addition)

Draft for all nine states
Website and onboarding
Every in-app state
Refined from real use

Screen states such as new user, empty, loading, error, incomplete data, nothing due, needs attention and navigator offline are part of the UI design for every surface. Nothing extra for you to track.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 07 — HOW WE WOULD BUILD IT00 — 63

How we’llwork together

Rhythm

  • A weekly sync-up with your team
  • Design reviews timed to each milestone
  • One decision-maker on your side
  • Physician sign-off on all clinical wording
  • Design QA with your developers at each handoff
  • Shared design files, open to your team throughout

One shared decision log

Your brief asks us to keep facts, assumptions, proposals and open questions apart, and never to turn an assumption into a requirement quietly. So every statement that shapes a design sits in one of four columns, and moves only when it has been checked and agreed.

Established facts

True today, and checked.

For example

Navigators already guide patients, mainly in cancer care.

Founder assumptions

Believed, but not yet tested.

For example

One navigator can look after about 150 families.

Proposed capabilities

Ideas we are suggesting.

For example

A light check-in rhythm for Green customers.

Open questions

Need a decision from you.

For example

When a result is serious, who hears first?

How one item moves

A founder assumption

“About 150 families per navigator”

→

Tested in Phase 1

We shadow navigators and count the real work, by type of family.

→

Agreed and recorded

It becomes a fact, or two numbers: preventive members and families in active care.

Nothing becomes a requirement until it has been checked and agreed.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 07 — HOW WE WOULD BUILD IT00 — 64

How we’ll knowit’s working

Your brief’s four usability measures stay, tested in every round: onboarding unaided, understanding a result, naming the next step, and knowing the platform’s limits. These ten go further: five that show whether families trust Previu, and five that show whether the service works as designed.

Is it working for families?

Promises kept

Reply and update times met, by navigators and by physicians.

Time to clarity

From a result being ready to the customer confirming they understand it.

Follow-through

Recommended next steps completed within the clinically agreed window.

Return for the recheck

Customers who come back for their next scheduled test.

Remembered experience

How families rate an episode once it closes, and whether they’d bring a parent.

Is the service working as designed?

Silence escalations

Items that reached the navigator lead or Medical Director because nobody acted in time.

Hold integrity

Results seen by a customer before physician clearance. The target is zero.

Drop-off by stage

Where people stop between Baseline, Clarify, Imaging and Pathways, and why.

Cost pauses

Next steps paused for cost, and how many resume after a conversation.

Caseload health

Overdue items and active-care load per navigator, against the plan.

Baselines come from the first usability round and the first month of live use. Targets are agreed with you after that, as your brief suggests.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 07 — HOW WE WOULD BUILD IT00 — 65

What we needfrom you to start

A few decisions shape the design from day one, and a little access lets us learn from the real work.

Decisions

Who pays first, and who the website speaks to
This shapes the homepage and the family model.

Who your navigators are, and how they are measured
This decides whether they can be trusted as guides.

How physicians are scheduled, and their review times
Every waiting message depends on it.

Whether the first follow-up can sit inside Baseline
This removes the most anxious payment.

Family permission rules for serious results
This decides who hears first.

Access

The feature inventory, current builds and screens
So we build on what exists, as your brief asks.

Time with two or three navigators and one physician
Half a day each, watching real work.

A handful of families for early conversations
Adult children and parents, ideally both.

Technical constraints, including how lab reports are delivered
This settles the first of the six things to resolve.

The approval process and timeline
Who signs off what, and by when.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
PART 07 — HOW WE WOULD BUILD IT00 — 66

Appendix

Your questions

Your brief ended with seven questions. Here are our answers.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
00 — 67

Question 1 of 7

Does the home screen make “where am I and what’s next” obvious in five seconds, including the state where items need attention?

What sits behind it

You want the Today screen to calm people, not test them, and you suspect the reference only works when nothing is wrong.

Our answer

Not yet, and not because of the layout. Your reference works well when nothing is due: a status, a next step, a named navigator. The state that matters most, “needs attention”, hasn’t been designed. That is the moment someone opens the app worried.

We’d design that state first. Every status carries its why: what we checked, what’s outside the usual range, why it is or isn’t expected for this person, who reviewed it, and when they’ll hear next.

Then we test it. Five or six people, including adult children reading a parent’s results, asked one question: where do you stand, and what happens next? If they can’t answer in five seconds, we redesign.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
YOUR QUESTIONS00 — 68

Question 2 of 7

Which label works best for reaching a person? If you add an AI assistant, how does it hand off to a human?

What sits behind it

You want the human to be the obvious way in, and you’re wary of an assistant that gets between a family and their navigator.

Our answer

Lead with the person, by name. “Message Aswathy”, with “Your care navigator” beneath, her photo and an honest reply time. A named person builds more trust than any label.

If an AI assistant arrives, it says “AI”, sits second to the person, and never pretends otherwise. Its job is the routine: where is my report, how do I prepare, when is my draw.

When a question touches a result, a worry or a decision, it hands over to the navigator with the conversation attached, so nobody repeats themselves. We’d test “Message your navigator”, “Care guide” and the navigator’s name with five or six people before locking it.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
YOUR QUESTIONS00 — 69

Question 3 of 7

How should one timeline show episodic results and continuous wearable data without overwhelming a first-time user?

What sits behind it

You want one living record, not a dashboard that floods a new user with numbers on day one.

Our answer

The timeline is made of events that mattered: a blood draw, a reviewed result, a follow-up, a milestone. That is what a first-time user sees, with the source and date on every item.

Wearable data sits in a trend layer that people open on purpose. It is summarised (“resting heart rate steady this month”), labelled with its device, and never looks as authoritative as a lab result. Your own rules say this; the design makes it visible.

For a new user with almost nothing on record, the timeline says what will appear and when, instead of showing an empty chart.

Where this lives in the proposal

Every status needs its why (p. 21)  ·  Phase 4 · Deepen (p. 62)

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
YOUR QUESTIONS00 — 70

Question 4 of 7

Should the website and staff portals follow the patient app’s light theme, or stay dark and share only accent colour and type?

What sits behind it

You want one brand across every surface without compromising how navigators and physicians work all day.

Our answer

One token system matters more than light or dark. If the severity scale, type and spacing are shared, the surfaces feel like one product whatever the background.

We’d default everything to light, including the portals, because your status colours (peach, amber, rose) were chosen for light surfaces. On dark backgrounds they shift, and in a clinical tool a colour that reads differently is a risk.

Navigators spend long days in the dashboard, so we’d offer a dark mode later if they ask for it, built from the same tokens. The decision is made in Phase 2, with the design-system foundations.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
YOUR QUESTIONS00 — 71

Question 5 of 7

Where would a first-time user most likely stall between Baseline and Pathways, and how do we remove that point?

What sits behind it

You want to know where people drop out before they reach care, the part of Previu that matters most.

Our answer

At Clarify, the moment a follow-up is recommended. As planned, it arrives with worry and a price together. That is where trust breaks, and people pause or leave.

Keep care and cost apart: explain the result calmly, give the physician’s reasoning, leave time for questions, then show the cost separately in the app. Consider including the first follow-up in Baseline.

The second stall is Imaging, if partners aren’t ready by around 20 November. A clear fallback, not a dead end, keeps people moving: the navigator arranges an alternative and says so plainly.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
YOUR QUESTIONS00 — 72

Question 6 of 7

How do we make DPDP consent clear and lightweight without breaking the flow?

What sits behind it

You need to comply fully without burying a worried person in legal text at sign-up.

Our answer

Ask in layers, at the moment each kind of data is first needed, not in one bundle at sign-up. Sharing a report with a physician, adding a family member, connecting a wearable: each gets its own short, plain explanation of what is shared, with whom, and why.

Each adult consents for themselves, so family access is designed person by person, and withdrawing is as easy as giving. A parent decides what their children can see.

The DPDP Rules’ main duties phase in by May 2027. Building consent this way now avoids rework later. Your legal team confirms the wording; we design how it reads.

Where this lives in the proposal

Family is one flow (p. 28)  ·  Phase 2 · The front door (p. 60)

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
YOUR QUESTIONS00 — 73

Question 7 of 7

Who is the website’s primary audience, and what single action should it drive?

What sits behind it

You need the website to work in ten seconds for one clear person, not for everyone at once.

Our answer

It’s a business decision, so we’d make it with you in Phase 1, but we’d arrive with a hypothesis to test.

Our hypothesis: adult children arranging care for a parent. They often manage and pay for a parent’s tests, and the family model in your brief already points to them.

The single action would be “Talk to a navigator” or “Book your Baseline”. We’d test both with five or six people before launch. Corporate partners and investors get their own page, so the homepage can speak clearly to one person.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
YOUR QUESTIONS00 — 74

Closing chapter

Stay human

AI can do the reading. People do the caring.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
00 — 75

Automate the door.Keep the doorman.

There is a well-known story about a hotel that replaced its doorman with an automatic door. The door opened perfectly. But the hotel had quietly lost its security, the welcome for regular guests, the taxis it hailed, and a signal of quality.

None of that was in the job description.

What the job description says

  • Sends messages
  • Books tests and scans
  • Chases follow-ups
  • Updates the record

What a navigator actually does

  • Notices when someone goes quiet
  • Calms a frightened family
  • Knows when to call instead of text
  • Earns the trust that brings people back

AI can do the left column well. Only people can do the right one. That is how Previu gets AI’s efficiency without losing what families come for.

Behavioural economists call this the doorman fallacy: valuing a role only by its most visible task.

UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
STAY HUMAN00 — 76

Use AI.Stay human.

You plan to use AI, and you should. It can read every result and draft every message. But every result belongs to a person, and how that person feels decides whether Previu is trusted.

What AI does well

  • Cross-references every result, across time
  • Drafts messages and explanations
  • Surfaces today’s themes for navigators
  • Summarises cases for physicians

What people must do

  • Deliver hard news
  • Reassure, and stay
  • Decide the next step, with a physician
  • Notice what the data can’t

The rules between them

  • AI is always labelled as AI, and never diagnoses
  • A person approves anything clinical
  • It hands over with the history attached
  • A human is always one tap away
UX PROPOSAL ’26
Stay
with
them
’26
10
+++
STAY HUMAN00 — 77

Staywiththem

“We stay with you” has to be felt, not just said. Most of all while someone is waiting for news.

Next step

If you have any questions, we’re open to a meeting. In it, I’m happy to answer every question your team has.

sheetal@thetribe.team+91 905 906 8986www.thetribe.team

Prepared for Previu Health · October 2026

All rights reserved © 2026 The Tribe Team